|
Leader: Neil Denny
Attendees: Dennis Sheppard; Jeff Nutbeem;
Christine Clacey; Dave Clarke; Lynn Tulip;
Richard Derwent Cooke; Suzanne Cauchi
Discussion Points:
Different reasons for using ecademy. One felt
if phone rang every day then that was
perfection and the interface was immaterial.
We had comparisons to other sites – Business
Scene and NRG. The former has a very
effective events diary system. Ecademy diary
gets congested, not least with personal
matters.
NRG is of course a different beast and its
website is more of an information depot.
|
Thoughts of the Discussion Leader
|
|
A perfect Ecademy would present even better
tools for users to be self organising.
We would expect to see a perfect Ecademy to
have mobile accessibility and functionality.
Concerns were expressed that greater
emphasis on the business side of things was
required with a debate on moderation. Non
moderation leads to a lot of noise which can be
hard or time consuming to filter through to get
to the good stuff..
All but one of us felt business leads and work
was a primary reason for joining Ecademy. The
exception enjoyed the social aspect more.
Dave explained that recent survey placed the
emphasis on increasing contacts. Query
whether that suggests more work or are we
talking about contacts providing business
support.
Richard said the social side of Ecademy was
the plastic toy in the cereal but it wasn’t
breakfast.
The interface could be much less cluttered.
User defined interface possible?
|
What were the conclusions?
Perfection would always be subjective but the
interface, stronger business bent and more
work generation seemed consistent goals.
What is going to happen next?
Ongoing debate on Ecademy hopefully.
|